In the USA the rich and upper middle class can create uniformity by exclusion, but this should not be mistaken for actual equality. It would only be useful to look at whole metro areas.
For the JetPack Twitter button to work, I have to manually choose the hi-res image because the first image in the article is a thumbnail with a width of 350px. That’s why looking at gini coefficients for USA counties is foolish. Areas of interest Leadership Clinical Education & Supervision Advocacy Bilingualism Teletherapy Early Intervention Continuing Education Practice Issues. Right now the default image for FB and TW is the First Image found in the article (i.e., A prominent image from the page’s content). It’s not an equality place, it’s a suburb that has managed to exclude the poor from the entire county. If it doesnt work, You may need to consider performing a Reset of Edge Chromium. Temporary Disable or Uninstall Edge extensions. Custom > Background > Turn on 'Image of the day'. Open Edge > New tab > Click the gear icon. Supporting this idea, the map in the article shows only one blue (low inequality) county in the whole Northeast metro area (Washington to Boston), and this is Loudoun county Virginia, a suburban county with median household income of $147,111 – one of the highest in the country. Select Custom > Background > off then Restart your PC. My supposition is that the suburban counties with less equality have uniformly high incomes: everyone is upper middle class.
However, this article doesn’t say anything about the actual median income of each county. The least rural counties had almost as much increase in Gini coefficient as the most urban counties, and all types of counties are now at a Gini coeffficient of 0.43 or 0.44, except for “moderately urban” ones – which are implied to be “suburban”, though those still have a 0.4 which is not much less. While the headline correctly notes that inequality has gotten worse in more urban counties, it also got worse in rural and exurban counties.
0 kommentar(er)
